通信人家园

 找回密码
 注册

只需一步,快速开始

短信验证,便捷登录

搜索

军衔等级:

  新兵

注册:2019-3-271
跳转到指定楼层
1#
发表于 2019-4-1 19:00:40 |只看该作者 |倒序浏览
本帖最后由 jeffyko 于 2019-4-2 09:12 编辑

在38.304中协议中有一段这样的描述:
When SearchSpaceId other than 0 is configured for pagingSearchSpace, the UE monitors the (i_s + 1)th PO. A PO is a set of 'S' consecutive PDCCH monitoring occasions where 'S' is the number of actual transmitted SSBs determined according to ssb-PositionsInBurst in SIB1. The Kth PDCCH monitoring occasion for paging in the PO corresponds to the Kth transmitted SSB. The PDCCH monitoring occasions for paging which do not overlap with UL symbols are sequentially numbered from zero starting from the first PDCCH monitoring occasion in the PF. When firstPDCCH-MonitoringOccasionOfPO is present, the starting PDCCH monitoring occasion number of (i_s + 1)th PO is the (i_s + 1)th value of the firstPDCCH-MonitoringOccasionOfPO parameter; otherwise, it is equal to i_s * S.
这段话我理解起来仍然有几个疑惑:
1、当SearchSpaceId 不为 0时,PO是一组S个PDCCH监控时机,S又是SSB的数量,那是不是说每个SSB后面都有一个paging 的SearchSpace?
2、如果1为真,pagingSearchSpace定义的周期跟SSB的周期一样的了,这样一来pagingSearchSpace中的monitoringSlotPeriodicityAndOffset也会定义一个周期,不会冲突吗?
3、协议上为什么要说一句The PDCCH monitoring occasions for paging which do not overlap with UL symbols are sequentially numbered from zero starting from the first PDCCH monitoring occasion in the PF(从PF中的第一PDCCH监视时机开始,从零开始顺序编号不与UL符号重叠的用于寻呼的PDCCH监视时机)这样的话?为什么要避开上行重复的symbol?

来来来,大牛们请开始表演,谢谢!

举报本楼

本帖有 4 个回帖,您需要登录后才能浏览 登录 | 注册
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 注册 |

手机版|C114 ( 沪ICP备12002291号-1 )|联系我们 |网站地图  

GMT+8, 2024-11-30 10:40 , Processed in 0.192514 second(s), 16 queries , Gzip On.

Copyright © 1999-2023 C114 All Rights Reserved

Discuz Licensed

回顶部