通信人家园

 找回密码
 注册

只需一步,快速开始

短信验证,便捷登录

搜索

军衔等级:

  新兵

注册:2019-12-10
跳转到指定楼层
1#
发表于 2020-2-17 14:30:03 |只看该作者 |倒序浏览
Question:
Why multipath channel can modelled as Finite Impulse Response (FIR) filters (what is the relationship between FIR filters and multipath channel)? and how to model it as FIR filters?

Answer:
If the receiver in the multipath channel receives signals from a single source, generally each path in the multipath is delayed one from another and generally each path has different attenuation. A FIR filter has as input a single sequence and the output is a set of signals that have been delayed and weighted (attenuated if you will). I hope the resemblance is clear enough now. For more than one source you would probably use one FIR filter per source. So, a FIR filter can be defined (perhaps a very sparse filter - i.e. one with many zero coefficients) that has an output that is the same as a (perhaps simplified) multiple-path environment.  This implies that the simulating filter have a unit delay that is adequate to resolve the paths as well as may be desired.  In general, delay is not known for a path to within the propagation time of a single wavelength - so resolution down to sub-wavelength times is most often unecessary. If antennas or arrays are involved then the output of the filter needs to take into account the attenuation at each angle of arrival due to the receive beam pattern.  At short range, the transmitter beam pattern may also be important.  Or, maybe I should really say that at long range maybe the transmitter beam pattern could be neglected.  It depends on the geometry. Things get more complicated and depart from the FIR filter model when the paths are dynamic and introduce Doppler shifts, etc.Fred

举报本楼

您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 注册 |

手机版|C114 ( 沪ICP备12002291号-1 )|联系我们 |网站地图  

GMT+8, 2024-12-1 00:25 , Processed in 0.093581 second(s), 15 queries , Gzip On.

Copyright © 1999-2023 C114 All Rights Reserved

Discuz Licensed

回顶部